Skip to main content

GST: A Game Changer

The constitution of India calls India an indestructible union of destructible states. The new Goods and Services Tax (GST) strengthens this notion of an indestructible union.
The GST is a destination based indirect tax inserted in concurrent list of Schedule 7 in the constitution that will replace multiple cascading indirect taxes applied by the center and the states. It has been added in Article 246A through 101st constitutional amendment act. The GST will subsume central taxes such as central excise duty, service tax, central surcharges and cesses and state taxes such as state sales tax, state VAT, luxury tax, entry tax, entertainment and amusement tax, taxes on lotteries, gambling and betting and state surcharges and cesses. The revenue of the tax would go to the state where the good originates.
The GST council has come out with a multi-tiered tax structure – 0% on products on consumer price basket including foodgrains, 5% on items of mass consumption like spices and mustard oil, 12% on processed foods, 18% on soaps, oil, toothpaste, refrigerator, smartphones, 28% on white goods, cars and 28% plus cess on luxury cars, pan masala, tobacco and aerated drinks. Fresh meat, milk, eggs and petroleum products, aviation turbine fuel, alcohol for human consumption and electricity have been exempt from GST as of now and will continue to remain under state list. Taxes applicable at municipal level have also been kept out of the purview of GST. Entities with turnover under 20 lakhs too have been given exemption from GST.
Since various taxes will be subsumed into one, GST will enable free flow of trade and boost tax receipts. HSBC points out that GST could bring a 45 bps increment in India’s economic growth. It would mean compliance to a single tax structure instead of multiple complex taxes earlier to be paid by manufacturers and service provides but ultimately to be borne by consumers. GST addresses the issue of different taxes such as excise, VAT and service tax in different states which created problems for enterprises in doing business in different states.
The GST council which is the apex institution for making laws on GST, comprising of Union Finance Minister, MoS for Revenue and state finance ministers, announced July 1, 2017 as the day of rollout of the GST. The Council is to compensate states for up to 5 years for any loss of revenue during implementation.
India has implemented the Canadian model of GST – a dual GST in which Central GST (CGST) will be collected by the center and State GST (SGST) that will be collected by state. To legislate on GST both parliament and states will have concurrent powers, except integrated GST (IGST) on the inter-state supply of goods and services and imports.
While currently close to 150 countries have GST laws in some form, the Indian GST is unique in its credit matching concept, according to which a buyer can avail input credit of GST paid if the seller has deposited for the GST received from that buyer. In services, for a supplier giving services outside his state of registration will have different set of regulations. Also, globally while closely related entities transact at zero rate in groupings, in India separate registrations of the same legal entity as independent tax person brings efficiency in cash flows and compliance. In e-commerce, tax collection at source is applicable. Small businesses with turnover under 50 lakh can opt for a composition scheme where they will only have to pay a 1 or 2% tax on the entire transaction but without being able to take the credit on input.
While the larger consequences of the implementation of GST are positive, certain loopholes can be pointed out. First, the center is permitted to levy an additional 1% tax in the course of inter-state movement of goods, the revenue from which will be given to the state where the supply of good origins. It can be argued that this provision is against the spirit of GST since the good will be sold cheaper in the state of origin than in any other state and could result in cascading of taxes. Second, implementation of GST has been a cause of distress to sectors in FMCG and consumer durables who had to undertake rapid destocking by selling their goods at discounted prices. Third, as a paperless movement of goods and services was anticipated, the GST laws have mandated e-way bills which may be difficult to comply for some. Flaws have also been pointed out in the GST laws such as the multi-tiered tax structure itself, which negates the cause of a unifying GST. Besides, postponing the levy of GST on petro-products could continue the cascading of taxes.  GST could also lead to a hike in prices during initial phase of implementation, but the government has been careful to take anti-profiteering measures against those who do not pass benefits of input credit to customers.
However, GST is an appreciable change in the former indirect tax structure. GST will simplify tax hurdles in the economy by allowing tax credit from procurement of inputs and capital good which can be set off against output liability. It will therefore benefit both SME and big enterprises. It is going to be the cornerstone of a single market that will enable free movement of goods and services across states. GST is set to benefit both manufacturers due to ease of doing business and consumers due to reduction in costs of daily goods.
Some other benefits of GST include centralization of storing stocks for ease of transportation and logistics provision. This will benefit the states in the heart of India such as Madhya Pradhesh & Chattisgarh and generate revenue there. Or it could enable companies to open multiple warehouses in different places and create that many jobs. Needless to say, the logistics industry is going to get a big push.
GST will also boost investment both from indigenous entrepreneurs who can now avail benefits of an open market and foreign investors who will get appealed by free movements of goods and services within India. This could foster a waning capital expenditure. For Make in India, GST will be a blessing in disguise as it will make goods more competitive in international market due to provision of refund on the entire amount of tax to exporters. It will also increase the tax base by formalizing a large part of untaxed economy who will register in the new GST tax regime and account all transactions. Many SME which earlier did not report sales and revenue will be included too. GST Network that has been created with 49% stake of government to provide technical infrastructure for implementation has reported a 6.6million enrollment already. GSTN in itself will limit the physical interaction between tax payer and tax collector and therefore minimize instances of corruption.
We now need to ensure training provisions and device outreach programs on continuous basis for all stakeholders. With due diligence given in implementation of GST, it is bound to be a boon for India which will be host a barrier free trade. GST celebrates the diversity of Indian union. The onus is now on us, the citizens, to make this great tax reform in the history of independent India a success.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is real on reel really real?

Realism in International Relations denotes that the world politics is driven by competitive self-interest. In media, ethical representation governs that it should never be driven by self-interest. What you do for the self is a biased adaptation of reality, and reality on camera is fiction, not a fact. “The camera’s rendering of reality must always hide more than it discloses…only what which narrates can make us understand”, said internationally acclaimed ace photographer, Susan Sontag. The camera when it must have come into the hands of the elite few would have been used to capture the truth. Realism in arts refers to the depiction of truth. But depiction is not real and truth, not universal. The constant upgradation of camera and evolution of technology has led to the portrayal of a glossy fact, what may be a ‘fiction’ in reality. Why what is not shown is not shown, justifies for selective transparency. This reminds me how half truth is more dangerous than a lie. Your every

GLOBALIZATION AND ITS ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL IMPLICATION ON INDIAN SOCIETY

The globalization debate has been raging ever since it formally began in the mid-20 th century with the opening of institutions like World Bank and IMF. In technical sense, India opened up to Globalization much later in 1991 when it was felt important to liberalize market norms and allow privatization to encourage growth of its long stagnant economy. Historically however, India has long preached ideals of Vasudhev Kutumbhkam and Sarve Bhavantu Sukhina, carving out the Indian model of globalization . Last year, India marked the silver jubilee of this venture explained by concepts like global village (Marshall McLuhan) for borderless world (Kenichi Ohame) and compression in terms of time and space (Anthony Giddens). When thinking the impact of globalization, it becomes important to mark at the outset that it has affected different countries differently. The impact of globalization has divided scholars across the world into its defenders and critics. While Marxists criticize it a

What took the court outside the court?

In a move that shook the ethos and established traditions of one of the crucial three pillars of the democratic apparatus, the Indian Judiciary, four most senior judges of the Supreme Court took to the public to address grievances that faced the institution. Supreme Court senior-most judges addressing the media on Friday, January 13, 2017 (Photo: Reuters) After the letter that honourable Justice J Chelameshwar, Justice Rajan Gogoi, Justice Madan B Lokur and Justice Kurian Joseph collectively wrote to Chief Justice of India Dipak Mishra went addressed, the top judges relied on the fourth pillar to bring forth issues that in the words of the judges themselves “adversely affected the overall functioning of the justice delivery system”. ALLOTMENT OF CASES The judges said that the CJI is only first among equal, nothing more or nothing less. They expressed concern over CJI’s way of assigning cases to the benches and deciding the composition of the same. Without going specific,